This version (2017/05/27 13:44) is a draft.
Approvals: 0/1

[00:18:02] * ChanServ sets mode: +o temporalfox [09:17:22] * ChanServ sets mode: +o temporalfox

[09:46:08] * ChanServ sets mode: +o temporalfox [09:52:29] * ChanServ sets mode: +o temporalfox

[10:40:02] <BadApe> say i have a json array of objects i want to write into a db, normally i would iterate over the array and write each row

[10:41:05] <BadApe> but i have an async handler that writes a record now, i need someway to block the loop or not use a loop at all?

[11:54:36] <temporalfox> BadApe with 3.3 you can use batching I think for this

[12:11:43] <BadApe> good to know, thanks temporalfox

[12:11:50] <BadApe> what is the ETA for 3.3 ?

[14:20:13] <amack2> Hi, I have a publisher, writing to an address, and two consumers on this address. Published message are only seen by one consumer, in a round-robin fashion. I thought all message should be seen by all consumers. Am I missing something? I'm on 3.2.1

[14:39:49] <amack2> Sorry, my mistake: Two producers sending to the same address results in round-robin

[14:40:16] <amack2> eb.publish from two different verticales results in the expected behavior

[14:41:32] <AlexLehm> BadApe: you can simulate a loop with an async call by iterating the counter and call the same method with c+1 in the result handler of the previous call

[17:17:38] <skullcrasher> how do I wait in a REST api call (e.g. with spring) for the results of a vertx handler?

[18:03:15] * ChanServ sets mode: +o temporalfox [19:14:38] * ChanServ sets mode: +o temporalfox

[19:48:45] * ChanServ sets mode: +o temporalfox [20:06:53] * ChanServ sets mode: +o temporalfox

[20:35:31] * ChanServ sets mode: +o temporalfox [22:19:33] * ChanServ sets mode: +o temporalfox