[10:27:12] <myghty> *sigh… to many issues at work… I hope I will finish my vertx blogpost before 2018…
[15:11:40] <D-Spair> temporalfox: Great work on the compiler changes for Groovy!!! Much less painful than my first efforts!
[15:12:05] <D-Spair> I really didn't have to change any implementation code at all, just some unit tests.
[15:12:37] <temporalfox> D-Spair you are welcome
[15:12:46] <temporalfox> the feedback you provided is important
[15:13:04] <temporalfox> it confirms that the strategy to move away from groovy generated classes is viable for migration purpose
[15:13:25] <D-Spair> Before your changes, I was considering asking for a major version bump due to the extensive API changes, and now I am perfectly happy to let it roll as 3.4.0…
[15:14:26] <D-Spair> I need to learn more about Groovy Extension Methods obviously!!! Seems like you can do all sorts of wonderful magic with them.
[15:14:48] <temporalfox> http://mrhaki.blogspot.fr/2013/01/groovy-goodness-adding-extra-methods.html
[15:16:01] <D-Spair> Will that work with @CompileStatic I wonder?
[15:16:12] <D-Spair> Or is that a purely dynamic feature?
[15:16:42] <D-Spair> I guess that I can test and see for myself.
[18:16:40] <myghty> nabend
[18:21:28] * ChanServ sets mode: +o temporalfox [20:59:19] * ChanServ sets mode: +o temporalfox
[21:21:37] <pikajude> will someFuture.result() be null if the future is still executing?
[21:32:56] <pikajude> oh wait, this problem is easy